Stainless Steel 304 vs 316L: How to Choose the Right Material for a PASS BOX

Created on 01.22

Stainless Steel 304 vs 316L: How to Choose the Right Material for a PASS BOX

A PASS BOX, also known as a transfer hatch or airlock, is a critical component in cleanrooms, laboratories, and pharmaceutical or food production facilities. It allows materials to be transferred between controlled environments without compromising the integrity of either space. One of the most fundamental decisions when specifying a PASS BOX is the choice of stainless steel grade. 304 and 316L are the two most common contenders. This article breaks down their differences in corrosion resistance, suitability for various environments, and cost implications to help you make an informed decision.
Stainless steel laboratory pass box with glass doors and control panels.

Corrosion Resistance Comparison

The core difference between 304 and 316L stainless steel lies in their chemical composition, which directly dictates their resistance to corrosion.
Feature
Stainless Steel 304
Stainless Steel 316L
Key Composition
18% Chromium, 8% Nickel (18/8 stainless steel)
16-18% Chromium, 10-14% Nickel, 2-3% Molybdenum
Corrosion Resistance
Excellent resistance to atmospheric environments and organic chemicals. Standard choice for many applications.
Superior to 304. Excellent in a broader range of chemical environments, especially against acids and chlorides.
Pitting & Crevice Corrosion
Susceptible in environments containing chlorides (e.g., salt spray, bleach, disinfectants).
Addition of Molybdenum dramatically increases resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion caused by chlorides.
Acid Resistance
Good against most organic acids. Poor against strong acidic chlorides.
Good resistance to a wider range of acids, including dilute sulfuric and phosphoric acids.
Key Point: The critical differentiator is Molybdenum in 316L. This element significantly enhances the alloy's ability to withstand attack from chlorides, which are notoriously damaging to stainless steel and can cause pitting. This makes 316L the clear winner in harsh or unpredictable chemical environments.

Applicable Environments

Stainless Steel 304 PASS BOX is suitable for:

  • General Cleanrooms & Electronics: Environments with controlled atmospheres and minimal chemical exposure.
  • Dry Material Transfer: Transfer of packaged goods, tools, or components where no aggressive chemicals are present.
  • Food & Beverage (Non-Aggressive): For dry areas or products with mild organic acids.
  • Cost-Sensitive Projects: Where the operating environment is known to be mild and non-corrosive.

Stainless Steel 316L PASS BOX is required for:

  • Pharmaceutical & Biotech: Where aggressive disinfectants, acids, or solvents are used regularly.
  • Coastal or Marine Environments: Facilities exposed to salt-laden air containing chlorides.
  • Chemical Laboratories & Processing: Any area involving transfer of materials exposed to acids, halides, or corrosive chemicals.
  • Sterile Injectable Production: High-hygiene areas requiring frequent and harsh sterilization cycles.
  • Food Processing (Aggressive): Areas with high salt content, acidic sauces, or brine solutions.

Cost Analysis

The decision always involves a financial trade-off.
  • Material Cost:
  • Fabrication Cost:
  • Total Cost of Ownership (TCO):

Conclusion

Selection Guideline:
  • Choose Stainless Steel 304 if:
  • Choose Stainless Steel 316L if:
Always assess the specific chemicals, cleaning regimens, and environmental conditions the PASS BOX will face throughout its lifespan. Consulting with your PASS BOX manufacturer about your process requirements is always recommended.
Welcome to visit our website:https://www.gcccleanroom.com/pass-box.html
Contact
Leave your information and we will contact you.
WhatsApp